![]() |
Letter of Resignation from Zone Leaders in San Francisco
|
To The Leadership Group of the San Francisco Church of Christ, This letter is our resignation from Leadership as Zone leaders and we request to be removed from the membership roll of this church. After much Prayer and Soul searching my wife and I feel that we can no longer continue to be a part of the San Francisco church. Please understand that this has nothing to do with Bitterness, or lack of Forgiveness but is out of concern for people we feel are being neglected and not heard. We are extremely tired from trying desperately to exact changes that Leadership in San Francisco does not wish to address. When we first came to San Francisco from New York - we knew immediately that the church was different. Initially we just chalked it up to "regional differences". However, the longer we were here, we had to admit to ourselves that we liked California except for the Church. We resolved to talk to our leaders about the things we saw hurting people and felt we could help a change to happen. We have had many conversations with the _______ and the _______ about changes that we feel would benefit the church, and how specific needs could be met. Although we were listened to, no changes were made and we watched people struggle and leave in spite of our best prayers, efforts and leadership conversations. Galatians 4:16, "Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth?" When the Henry Kriete letter came out, we had great hope that Leadership in San Francisco would see some changes that could be made and that the church would change. However after the 3/1 service, we realized that the leadership here in San Francisco does not "get it". In other services all over the world, Leaders have been open about very specific sins when asking a congregation for forgiveness. In any sin study, if a person apologized the way we were apologized to on Saturday night they would have been told that they were vague, needed to be more specific and open about their sin and that they were not broken. The San Francisco apologies were very vague and hollow, to the point where new Disciples didn't understand what was going on, we believe that this was the intention. The reason we believe that this was the intention is because the leadership consensus group has set a precedent in controlling information by banning/censoring Golden Rule Leadership, which advocates many of the same ideas as Henry's letter. __________ admitted to us that though he had never read the book, he agreed to censor it. I challenged him on the integrity of his vote, because he had never read the book, but went along with what the rest of the group voted. Banning the book is a means of controlling information that is released to the congregation, why was that deliberate sin not apologized for? There is no remorse for doing such a thing, just like there appears to be no intention of letting the congregation read Henry's Letter - even though Churches all over the world are making radical changes based upon its content, and encouraging their members to read it. |
We were also concerned that Russ would gloat about being one of the few Former World Sector Leaders still standing. We feel that the only reason no one has asked for his resignation is because of the extreme fear of leadership that exists in this congregation, he has gathered people around him who say what his itching ears want to hear.(2 Timothy 4:3). We feel we can no longer support a church that says it cares about the people, but whose actions reveal a heart of stone, not a heart of flesh. We have had an opportunity to speak, but for other regular members there is no plan for their voices to be heard. We feel that this means there is not a true heart of repentance here in San Francisco. We see Worldly Sorrow not Godly Sorrow (Godly sorrow brings repentance that leads to salvation and leaves no regret, but worldly sorrow leads to death-2 Cor. 7:10).
|